"Dossier: Scattered Speculations on Value"

Toni Negri

Introduction by Ronald Judy

In the spring of 1996, Marcia Landy and I organized a boundary 2 panel for the annual Rethinking Marxism conference held in Amherst, Massachusetts, in December of that year. We thought that Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak's speculation on the relationship between value and affect ("Scattered Speculations") afforded an opportunity for rigorous engagement with these concepts, their historical significance, and their viability for understanding the emerging social formations attending the global economy. We envisioned a format of collective discussion carried out through individual papers and followed by an open discussion with Professor Spivak. Among those who agreed to join in this Sprechstimme were Antonio Negri, Michael Hardt, Reda Bensmaia, and Etienne Balibar. Unforeseen circumstances prevented Professors Spivak and Bensmaia from taking part. Through the graciousness of Hardt and Balibar, however, the panel went ahead. We never planned for Negri to come, given his well-known political predicament -- although at the time he was free in Paris, he could not enter the United States. Still, he prepared and sent a paper that Hardt translated from the Italian and I read aloud, to which Balibar gave an informed and engaging response. Negri's paper and Hardt's talk follow in these pages. (They expand on these notions in their forthcoming book, Empire.) Despite the absence of two colleagues, the event was well received. We owe sincere thanks to those who attended the session. We want to thank Stephen Cullenberg for giving us the opportunity to present our conversation in the venue of the Rethinking Marxism conference. We are most grateful to Etienne Balibar, Michael Hardt, and Antonio Negri. Our debt to Hardt and Negri is compounded by their agreeing to allow us to publish their papers in this issue of boundary 2.

jim submits:

"Bremer of Iraq"

Bill Berkowitz, (WorkingForChange, 05.09.03)


When L. Paul Bremer III sets down in Iraq as the U.S.'s new overseer of
reconstruction, he'll be bringing a lot of baggage along with him. Chosen by
President Bush for his expertise in counter-terrorism, crisis management and
diplomacy, Bremer has a resume that includes extended service in the Reagan
Administration, an eleven-year stint at Kissinger & Associates, and the
co-chairmanship of the Heritage Foundation's Homeland Security Task Force.
That President Bush has turned to a civilian and a skilled negotiator -- the
president called Bremer a "can-do-type person'' -- is indicative of the
administration's fear that events in post-war Iraq are in danger of spinning
out of control. Bremer, the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Marsh Crisis Consulting, a subsidiary of the Marsh & McLennan Companies
(MMC), will take the reins of the multi-billion dollar reconstruction
project from retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner, the administration's first civil
administrator, and assume command over the Office of Reconstruction and
Humanitarian Affairs.


Full story continues at:

Bremer of Iraq"

Jason Adams writes:

"Proletariat or Multitude? A Postanarchist Critique of Empire"

Jason Adams


Introduction: A Proletarian Ideology of Progress and Productivity?

Though it is not clearly articulated as such, underlying the argument of Hardt and Negri's much-acclaimed book, Empire there is a fundamental singularity/universality nexus that is typically deployed as the basis for the emerging counter-Empire of the multitude as well as for the postmodern sovereignty of world order and the informatized production of postmodern capitalism; this is then juxtaposed to the particularity/universality nexus that had been deployed by the new social movements and left-wing nationalisms of the late twentieth century as well as the modern sovereignty and industrial production systems which they are depicted as having been actively refusing.

"The Progressive War"

Salim Muwakkil, In These Times, May 9, 2003

The pro-war progressives want to claim the tradition of the anti-Stalinist left of Cold War lore, but that analogy is faulty.


Among the many effects of the terrorism attacks of September 11, 2001, was the ideological shift they provoked among those on the left. Many left-leaning commentators were so disconcerted by some of their fellow travelers' responses to the attacks, they jumped straight into bed with the neocon war party.

Anonymous Comrade submits:

"Policy Through Rose-Colored Pilot's Glasses"

John Chuckman

Everyone, not attached by threadbare ideology or plain old war profiteering to President Bush's War on Terror, knows that even on its own terms, it can only fail miserably in a great waste of lives and substance. You cannot fight a war against religious faith and opposition to injustice unless you are prepared to be as utterly ruthless as Stalin, and even then, when you lie pickled in your tomb, the roots you missed destroying will grow hardy new plants, as they have in contemporary Russia. But I would never have expected stark evidence for failure to come so quickly.

hydrarchist submits: The following article is reprinted from May's Black Commentator


"Treat Corporate Media Like the Enemy,

& No Free Pass for Black Radio"


On June 2, transnational corporations claiming to be
American citizens are likely to win permission to complete
their conquest and consolidation of U.S. mass media, both
broadcast and print. Their servant is Colin Powell's son,
Michael, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission
and the most anti-public overseer of the public airwaves
since passage of the Federal Communications Act of 1934.

Marko writes:

"Anarchism and Human Survival:
Bertrand Russell's Problem"




Bertrand Russell throughout his long career as a public intellectual and political activist had reason to reflect on the follies of humanity and the real threats to human survival, threats which are self induced. Much speculation and movie making is devoted toward such survival threatening events as asteroid strikes and mantle head plumes. What is totally ignored is the threat to human survival posed by our own institutions. We can notch another one for the propaganda model; it is to be expected that our pathological institutions would not dwell on their inherent pathology. We can expect nothing less of the corporate media.

jim submits:

"What Does the Felling of the Monument Mean?"

Jürgen Habermas

Let us not close our eyes before this revolution in world affairs: the
normative authority of America lies shattered

1 The whole world watched that scene on the 9th of April in Baghdad,
followed the American soldiers placing the noose around the neck of
the dictator, watched the tyrant being felled from his pedestal in a
most symbolic act, before a jubilant crowd. First the apparently
immutable monument wobbles, then it falls. Before it crashes
liberatingly to the ground, gravity has to overcome the grotesquely
unnatural horizontal position in which the massive figure, gently
see-sawing up and down, is poised for one last disturbing second.

jim submits:

"Music From the Left"

R. G. Davis

In Noise: The Political Economy of Music, Jacques Attali argues that musical innovations prefigure social developments. For those of us interested in effecting changes in society he offers this thought: "Any theory of power today must include a theory of the localization of noise and its endowment with form" (1985, xi).


The form of most folk and almost all jazz/pop music does not (cannot) even reflect industrial social relations as we know them, much less make a comment on them. Classical music, or music organized by a trained composer, art music, is more likely to produce an instructional metaphor (and form) with which to examine the foundations of corporate society. I think that the structure/form of a musical composition, no matter what the lyrics, influences the listener's thoughts about the world. The structure contains a view of the world which the listener reiterates in his/her personal musical repetition. The structure then becomes a metaphor for a view of the world.

Full story continues at Davis

Anarchists and Palestine: Class Struggle or Popular Front?


  By Ryan Chiang McCarthy


   


  As the imperialist "war on terror" gains momentum, the conflict in Palestine is plunged continually into the center of world attention, conveyed so as to force us all to take positions along pre-defined lines- are you pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian? All states have joined the drive to polarize the world behind these fronts. For anarchists, it is vital not to compromise a class perspective, rejecting the programs of both Palestinian nationalism and Israeli genocide. In the US, where Israel must look for its lifeblood of weaponry and international clout, anarchists have a great responsibility to the proletariat of Israel and Palestine. Unfortunately, many US anarchists have chosen the way of the popular front.