nomadlab writes: "This is the most recent statement from RAWA (The Revolutionary Association of the Wom Afganistan":

Again, due to the treason of fundamentalist hangmen, our people have been caught in the claws of the monster of a vast war and destruction.

America, by forming an international coalition against Osama and his Taliban-collaborators and in retaliation for the 11th September terrorist attacks, has launched a vast aggression on our country.

Despite the claim of the US that only military and terrorist bases of the Taliban and Al Qieda will be struck and that its actions would be accurately targeted and proportionate, we have witnessed for the past seven days leaves no doubt that this invasion will shed the blood of numerous women, men, children, young and old of our country.

If until yesterday the US and its allies, without paying the least attention to the fate of democracy in Afghanistan, were supporting the policy of Jehadis-fostering, Osama-fostering and Taliban- fostering, today they are sharpening the dagger of the "Northern Alliance". And because of this policy they have plunged our people into a horrific concern and anxiety in fear of re-experiencing the dreadful happenings of the years of the Jehadis' "emirate".

Afghans, while keeping in mind the tremendous disasters they faced at the hands of Jehadi and Taliban vultures, just hang onto their hope for the return of the ex-king. However, if he comes to the scene while relying on the "Northern Alliance" and so-called "moderate" Taliban, he not only will lose his reputation among the people but it will endanger the stability and success of whatever set-up he forms.


read the rest of this statement at infoshop.org"

International Monetary Fund
700 19th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20431 USA



IMFC and Development Committee Meetings To Be Held November 17-18, 2001
in Ottawa



The Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Horst Köhler,
and the President of the World Bank, James D. Wolfensohn, after
consultation with the institutions' Boards of Executive Directors, and
with the chairmen of the International Monetary and Financial Committee
(IMFC) and the Development Committee (DC), Gordon Brown and Yashwant
Sinha, are pleased to accept the invitation made by the Canadian Finance
Minister, Paul Martin, to host meetings of the IMFC and DC in Ottawa on
November 17-18, 2001.



These meetings will bring together ministers and central bank governors
from around the world to discuss issues of importance to the membership
of the IMF and World Bank, especially including the global economic
outlook in the wake of the tragic events of September 11; their impact,
in particular, on the poorest; the ongoing work to improve the stability
of the international financial system; and preparations for the
forthcoming United Nations Conference on Financing for Development.



IMF EXTERNAL RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

Public Affairs: 202-623-7300 - Fax: 202-623-6278

Media Relations: 202-623-7100 - Fax: 202-623-6772

An international Gallup poll
(http://www.gallup-international.com/terrorismpoll _figures.htm)
showed :



A full 32 out of 35 countries (the US, Israel and India in opposition) favored
a criminal justice response, rather than military action, in response to the
terrorist attack on America.



The numbers were clear: 67%-88% in NATO/Western countries and 83%-94% in Latin
America favoring a non-military approach.



Surprisingly, 30% of US respondents also supported this option even though US
corporate media consistently ignores it.



France had the highest support for military action of the European countries
with 30%. Britain 18. Greece with 8%.



All of the European countries were well above 60% in support of extradition to
stand trial.



It would be surprising and welcome if any of the corporate media in the US
reported this.



No doubt if the results were the opposite every single corporate media outlet
would carry it.



Once agendas are set, only approved "facts" are selected instead of the other
way around.



So much for a reasoned approach.

Readers interested in the following story may also wish to read our earlier piece:World Bank Responds to Four Demands from Mobilization for Global Justice.

Joe Stiglitz: The Globalizer Who Came In From The Cold



The World Bank's former Chief Economist's accusations are
eye-popping - including how the IMF and US Treasury fixed the
Russian elections



by Greg Palast, The Observer, London, October 10, 2001



"It has condemned people to death," the former apparatchik told
me. This was like a scene out of Le Carre. The brilliant old
agent comes in from the cold, crosses to our side, and in hours
of debriefing, empties his memory of horrors committed in the
name of a political ideology he now realizes has gone rotten.



And here before me was a far bigger catch than some used Cold War
spy. Joseph Stiglitz was Chief Economist of the World Bank. To a
great extent, the new world economic order was his theory come to
life.

jim writes: "Bomb Hits Kabul Red Cross Center



The Associated Press

Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2001; 9:02 a.m. EDT

KABUL, Afghanistan –– The compound of the International Committee of the Red Cross was struck Tuesday by a U.S. bomb which destroyed wheat and other humanitarian supplies, committee officials and witnesses said. One Afghan security guard was injured.



"Two depots of the Red Cross were destroyed," ICRC security chief Mullah Rohani said as he stood before the smoking compound in northern Kabul. "We are very sad because these things belong to the people."

WORLD WAR III REPORT
#. 1. Sept. 30, 2001



by Bill Weinberg



WATCHING THE SHADOWS

US DRUG WAR AID TO TALIBAN?

Since the September 11 terrorist attacks and President Bush's declaration of "World War III" on regimes that support terrorism, a May 22 Los Angeles Times opinion piece by Robert Scheer has been circulating on the Internet, claiming that the US gave $43 million in Drug War aid to Afghanistan's Taliban regime this year. However, according to a May 18 AP report, the aid was mostly for drought relief, and to be distributed through NGOs, ostensibly bypassing the Taliban.

nomadlab writes: "first it was a Pakistani businessman and three Arab
Americans being removed from the planes they had tickets for because of fearful
passengers and crews.

then Eighty passengers and five crew members were held aboard a jet for three hours after it landed because a passenger said a man had dispersed a powdery substance in the ventilation system.


The substance was confetti from a greeting card that a man had accidentally spilled, FBI spokesman Andrew Black said.

and yesterday a Delta Air Lines flight from Atlanta to Newark, N.J. was diverted to North Carolina after two men were seen huddled together and speaking a foreign language in the back of the plane, officials said.


Officials at Charlotte/Douglas International Airport initially received reports that the men were trying to break into the cockpit, said Aviation Director Jerry Orr. It turned out to be two orthodox Jewish men praying together in the back of the plane, he said."

mackswell23 writes: " Apparently the US has decided that there are not enough land mines in Afghanistan. Better drop some more to be sure. See the Human Rights Watch alert below, and also see the New York Times article that HRW refers to at http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/11/international/as ia/11MILI.html?searchpv=past7days The relevant passage states that "The attacks involved about 10 B-52 and B-1 bombers, which took off from the island of Diego Garcia. They dropped "area munitions," including CBU-89 Gators, which are 1,000-pound "cluster bombs." Of course the Times gives no indication that these
"cluster bombs" are in fact anti-tank and anti-personnel land mines, nor does it attempt to give any sort of background information (e.g. the fact that there are already millions of land mines in Afghanistan, or the fact that the US is one of the few nations in the world that has not yet signed the Mine Ban Treaty) as to the significance of dropping these CBU-89 Gator things in Afghanistan. For more information about these lovely little weapons, see http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cbu-89.htm

(Of course, this makes the murder of 4 of those responsible for mine clean-up in Afghanistan (the first reported casualties, if you all remember) a very appropriate and poetic and unsurprising convenience.)"

The independent Israeli intelligence site Debka's military and intelligence sources report
that Presidents George W. Bush and Vladimir Putin, in
a single 70-minute conversation on September 23,
eleven days after the terrorist assaults in New York
and Washington, agreed on the deployment of tactical
weapons. This is an epic shift in the global balance
of strength.



Putin gave the nod for US forces poised in Central
Asia to jump into Afghanistan to be armed with
tactical nuclear weapons, such as small neutron bombs,
which emit strong radiation, nuclear mines, shells,
and other nuclear ammunition suited to commando
warfare in mountainous terrain.



In return, Bush assented to Russia deploying tactical
nuclear weapons units around Chechnya after Moscow's
ultimatum to the rebels, some of whom are backed by
Osama Bin Laden, to surrender, went by without
response. DEBKAfile's military sources place the US
nuclear weapons in four former Soviet Central Asian
bases: the military air facility at Tuzel, 15 km (10
miles) northwest of the Uzbek capital of Tashkent; at
Kagady in the Termez region; in Khandabad, near the
city of Karshi; and at the military air base in
Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan.



In addition to the nuclear weapons units, Russian
bombers carrying small neutron bombs were moved to
Russian military air bases around the border of the
breakaway province, in Stavropol northwest of
Chechnya, the Godowta base in Georgia to the south,
and Mozdok in northern Osetia, northwest of Chechnya.



Russian and U.S. military sources refuse to take
questions on these startling events.

Anonymous Comrade writes: "I received the following by e-mail from Declan McCullagh's politechbot.com mailing list:

1. The House Judiciary committee approved the "PATRIOT Act" 36-0, with a
two-year expiration date for wiretapping:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02614.html

2. The Senate voted last night 96-1 for the USA Act without Sen. Feingold's
privacy amendments:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02651.html

3. The House Rules committee met early this morning to set a rule that
specified what bill would go to the floor:
http://www.house.gov/rules/107rule2975.htm

4. According to the speaker's office, the bill is the "base Senate text" of
the USA Act with five or six changes that Rep. Conyers had wanted. One of
those is that the wiretap sections expire in December 2004 -- unless the
president decides it is in the "national interest" to continue them, which
would expire them in December 2006.

4. The House voted 211-205 midday today (along party lines) on a
preliminary procedural step allowing the bill to be considered.

5. Now they're about to vote on the rule. The rule does not allow
amendments, just provides for an up-or-down vote on the USA Act v2.0. CSPAN
is carrying this debate.

5. When the House approves the USA Act v2.0 -- I say "when" because I think
it's very likely -- it'll be sent back to the Senate for approval. Because
the changes (besides the expiration date) are minor, the Senate may vote
for it unchanged and send it to the president, something Rep. Senenbrenner
predicts will happen.

6. That means no conference committee is necessary.

7. You can find the USA Act v2.0 here:

http://www.house.gov/rules/sensen_028.pdf (525 KB)

http://www.well.com/user/declan/sep11/usa.act.v2.0 .101201.pdf (a mirror site)

POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/"